![]() ![]() The strategic and socially connected addition of notes to texts is now powering new approaches to knowledge production, peer review and revision, and scholarly communication. As our conversation continues over time, an ever-expanding network of annotation–through notation, citation, links, and data–traces an interconnected lineage of ideas and insight.Īnnotation has been a valuable form of social and scholarly media that predates, by centuries, today’s social media platforms. Scholars are likely familiar with the so-called “Great Conversation,” or the idea in Western thought that we collectively participate in an iterative process of knowledge production through reference, review, and refinement. In-line commentary during peer review is annotation, too. Commonplace features of digital publications like links and open data are annotations. An endnote or a translator’s gloss is annotation. It is literally and figuratively marginalĪ citation added to a manuscript is an annotation. We prefer a simple definition: Annotation is a note added to a text.Īnnotation is often perceived as incidental and irrelevant when compared to the authority of a primary source. To appreciate these innovations, a shared understanding of annotation is needed. Recent developments highlight the promising role of annotation when producing, reviewing and revising, and also disseminating scholarship. It is literally and figuratively marginal. Nonetheless, annotation is often perceived as incidental and irrelevant when compared to the authority of a primary source. For academics who study medieval manuscripts and well-worn books, marginalia are marks of cognition, communication, and can reveal traces of intellectual networks - indeed, Milton annotated Shakespeare. We write upon student papers to assess an argument and provide feedback. We add commentary and criticism to manuscripts during peer review. ![]() How so? Because, scholars are annotators. ![]() Whereas some may dismiss annotation as quotidian, we see great value in annotation helping academics to read, review, revise, and share scholarship. The everyday practice of annotation enables new forms of participatory scholarly communication and the democratisation of knowledge production. Reflecting on how new digital tools have re-invigorated annotation and contributed to the creation of their recent book, they suggest annotation presents a vital means by which academics can re-engage with each other and the wider world. However, drawing on their research and writing practice, Remi Kalir and Antero Garcia present a different view of annotation, as a vital mechanism by which academics have historically connected and interwoven their own thinking with contemporaries and those who have gone before them. In this context, critical means evaluative and may include both positive and negative comments.Annotations can often be seen as an interruption, something to be expunged from carefully maintained library collections and the version of record. Three Types of Annotations: Critical, Descriptive, and InformativeĪ Critical annotation includes value judgments or comments on the effectiveness of the work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |